Design Simulation for Warehouse Temperature Control

Airflow simulation can ensure tight temperature control for key drugs, before the storage space is built

By Flomerics, Inc.

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page

A pharmaceutical manufacturer needs to keep space temperatures in a warehouse between 68°F and 78°F to maximize shelf life of their products. The building’s HVAC control system was designed to issue an alert to plant operating personnel whenever temperatures in the space fall outside a +/- 3.5°F limit from setpoint.

Eichleay Engineers Inc. of California designed the air handling system for the warehouse.  Though the system could maintain the tight temperature tolerances there was very little margin for safety, especially in the vicinity of the 25 foot ceiling. Eichleay hired Flomerics Inc. consultants to simulate air flow and temperature in the warehouse using Flomerics’ Flovent software which is specifically designed for simulating heating and cooling of building interiors. The simulation matched physical measurements that showed that the air handling system alone was just able to hold the customer’s tight temperature requirements.

Eichleay Engineer’s requested that Flomerics’ consultants evaluate several design alternatives, which included addition of fans to increase air circulation within the warehouse. Flomerics’ identified a fan configuration that met the customer’s requirements for both temperature variation and air velocity. “The HVAC system has been in operation for over a year and the temperatures in the warehouse have never been outside the customer’s specified range,” said Michael Simpson, Mechanical Engineer for Eichleay Engineers.

Tough Requirements for Pharmaceutical Warehouse

The building contains 49,200 square feet of warehouse storage space and has a roof height that varies from 25 to 28 feet. In order to maximize the life of the pharmaceuticals stored in the facility the client established a requirement that the temperature throughout the entire interior space be held to 70°F with an allowable variation of only +/- 3.5°F. In addition, the client required that the building be maintained at less than 50% relative humidity. The outside design conditions varied from 95°F at 90% relative humidity in the summer and -20°F at 20% relative humidity in the winter.

“We began the project by using standard computer calculations to design an HVAC system that was capable of keeping the temperature in the building at the required level,” Simpson said. “The system included a 100 ton DX air conditioning system and duct mounted zone reheat coils for tight temperature control. This system could get us to the right average temperature but left us with very little safety margin. The difficulty was increased by the fact that the client wanted the ability to place pallets in any rack location in the building and stack them up to 19 feet high. Our challenge was to ensure that the temperature at any position and any level in the building is within the required tolerances. Not an easy task!”

Air Handling System Alone Could Just Meet Specifications

Construction personnel installed the equipment and performed field adjustments that brought the HVAC performance within specification. They bled air from the HHW piping system, replaced faulty HHW valves and adjusted the air handler controls for supply air temperature to match setpoint requirements. They replaced thermostats with less sensitive thermostats, relocated them to higher elevations and modified temperature setpoints. They modified the HVAC automation control system to lower the supply air temperature. This fine tuning substantially reduced the temperature variations but physical measurements still showed variation in the building from 68°F to 74°F.

Simpson now recognized that the building would require additional air handling equipment to narrow the temperature variations within the space. However, the cost of purchasing and installing stratification fans was too substantial to simply put them in and see if they would work, and hand calculations would not be nearly accurate enough because they could not account for the unique geometry of the building and its contents. So Simpson decided to seek the assistance of a consultant to simulate the airflow and heat transfer within the building with computational fluid dynamics (CFD).

“We called the two leading software companies in the HVAC CFD industry.  We knew that they both offered people with extensive experience in air flow simulation modeling. One of the companies told us that we would have to wait several weeks before they could even take a look at our problem. Flomerics told us they would be there the next day to give us an estimate and get started on our project.”

Simulating HVAC System Performance

While construction was continuing, Simpson provided Flomerics’ consultant Chris Wark with 2D drawings of the building, rack configuration and HVAC layout. Wark began by constructing a 3D model representing the building and adding boxes to represent the product pallets. The most important specification needed was to model the air distribution system.  This included the supply air volume, velocity and temperature as well as the physical locations of the supply diffusers and return registers.  The ambient air temperature outside the plant and insulating properties of the building were also entered. Wark ran a steady-state solution on the computer. He showed Simpson the results by looking at temperature mapped as color contour charts across horizontal sections at various levels above the floor.

Figure 1: Temperature plane through middle of product pallets with initial design shows temperatures ranging from 69°F to 74°F at 20’ 4” level with 95°F outside temperature

Next Simpson asked Wark to utilize the full power of a CFD model by modifying it to account for several alternatives that he was considering to reduce the temperature stratification in the building. The first option was to install eight 24-inch diameter Greenheck model MCY-24 fans and the second option was to install 50 smaller Airius destratification fans. The Greenheck fans, because of their large size, require fewer fans for enhanced destratification over pallets but also generate more noise and higher air velocities. The Airius fans are smaller, quieter, more difficult to see as they are the same color as the ceiling, more energy-efficient, easy to install and generate a lower air velocity but require the installation of many more fans. The purpose of simulation was to determine, in advance, exactly what results would be provided by each type of fan.

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page
Show Comments
Hide Comments

Join the discussion

We welcome your thoughtful comments.
All comments will display your user name.

Want to participate in the discussion?

Register for free

Log in for complete access.


No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments