CPG suppliers are looking for ways to begin implementing RFID solutions that require minimal initial investment, while still being capable of evolving and expanding in the future. As the usage of this RFID technology becomes more widespread, the CPG suppliers will want to better integrate RFID into other processes.
In supply chain automation applications, RFID serves the same function as printed barcodes, but RFID offers a number of distinct advantages. Data is automatically transmitted by radio waves and, therefore, RFID readers do not need the line of sight required by optically-scanning barcode readers.
RFID also offers a great deal of flexibility in the placement of identification tags, because data can be read at a greater distance. Additionally RFID even recognizes data through most packaging and product materials. For example, RFID tags placed on individual cases in a pallet can be automatically read, without unpacking the pallet.
Another advantage is that an RFID tag can store considerably more data than a barcode label, and it is possible to dynamically update the stored data. The RFID tag serves as a miniature database, allowing users to track the tagged object as it moves though the supply chain.
Resistance by CPG suppliers
The benefits for retailers like Wal-Mart are clear: RFID creates greater operating efficiencies and provides better inventory management to control stock outs, spoilage, and authentication. As you move upstream in the supply chain, however, the return on investment for RFID can sometimes be less obvious.
The situation is analogous to the adoption of barcode technology twenty-five years ago. Initially, in the mid 1970s, barcodes were intended to automate the checkout counter, at the tail end of the supply chain. Mass merchandisers, lead by Kmart, pushed suppliers to adopt the system. Only later, in the early 1980s, did it become apparent that barcodes and Universal Product Code (UPC) standardization offered enormous benefits in operating efficiencies and information management along the entire supply chain.
Some CPG suppliers are taking a strategic approach to RFID, investing in the technology to take advantage of the increased visibility of tracking information in order to re-engineer their internal processes. Other CPG suppliers offer RFID tagging, even when not mandated to do so, in order to competitively differentiate themselves and win new business from retailers that prefer products tagged with RFID.
But many CPG suppliers continue to take a cautious approach, looking for a way to quickly meet mandates from Wal-Mart and other retailers with minimum expense and minimum disruption to their manufacturing and distribution processes. They view RFID as a necessary cost of doing business the stakes that they must put up to sit at the table and stay in the game with the major retailers.
These suppliers reluctantly comply with mandated requirements today, but they do not want to commit to major investments in RFID until the technology matures, standards are fully established, prices reflect large economies of scale, and ROI for process re-engineering has been proven.
Incremental and selective implementation
Many observers predicted that the Wal-Mart mandate would represent a tipping point that would create a critical mass of RFID users and unstoppable momentum towards universal adoption of the technology. It is clear that RFID is here to stay, but the adoption pattern is evolutionary, not revolutionary.
The Wal-Mart mandate itself is an incremental process. The mandate currently applies only to products shipped to its Dallas-area distribution centers. Some of the top one hundred suppliers who fall under the mandate are placing RFID tags on only a fraction of their Stock Keeping Units (SKUs). Reportedly, some suppliers are initially tagging as few as a dozen SKUs, with plans to gradually increase that number over time.
CSG suppliers are looking for an RFID solution that can be quickly put into operation with minimal investment, and can be implemented incrementally and selectively for different SKUs and different retailers, as needed. The typical approach is called slap and ship, putting an RFID tag on a case or pallet just before it is shipped from a supplier's facility to a retailer's facility.
Two methods of slap and ship are available: one option is to replace existing barcode printers with a smart label printer that creates a barcode label with an embedded RFID transponder. The alternative is to apply an RFID Sticky Tag separate from the bar code label and encode the data into that tag with a separate encoder, in addition to the existing non-RFID barcode printer. For both methods, a barcode is printed and applied as a back-up for the RFID technology, since reliability of RFID has not yet been perfected.
Most barcode printer manufacturers, such as Zebra and Intermec, provide smart label machines to replace their own thermal barcode printers. These printers print on smart labels which typically range in size from 4x2 or 3x3 to 4x8 and contain an embedded RFID transponder.
Although the existing barcode printer is removed and a completely new machine needs to be purchased, the process is similar to an upgrade, utilizing the existing backend integration systems and processes. Software migration tools allow users to convert from the printing of barcode labels to the encoding of smart labels.
Paragon Data Systems, Inc., provides such a solution for clients who have opted for this approach. This solution works well when 100% of all cases or pallets will be tagged with RFID transponders, or when companies are working off-line in limited quantity.
Smarter than smart labels?
Many of our clients prefer an alternative approach, which leaves the existing barcode system in place and adds a separate RFID applicator system. With this arrangement, barcode labels are applied to 100% of all cases or pallets, but RFID tags are only applied to the subset of items, and for the particular retailers, that require RFID.
This process has several important advantages. First of all, RFID tags are only used when needed, without having to switch back and forth between rolls of conventional barcode labels and rolls of RFID-embedded smart labels.
For items that do require RFID tagging, an individual RFID tag is five to ten cents less expensive than a smart label that is embedded with a comparable RFID transponder. RFID tags are also more readily available and can be sourced from a larger number of suppliers.
An RFID applicator can be installed with little disruption to the current manufacturing, packaging and shipping processes. A system can simply be placed downstream from an existing barcode system.
An additional advantage of RFID applicators is that RFID tags come in a wider variety of types and sizes than the much larger 3x3 or 4x2 smart labels. The smaller sizes offer more flexibility in locating transponders, a capability that is especially important as the industry moves from tagging pallets and master cartons to tagging individual items.
Lastly, the RFID applicator saves on labor costs that will increase significantly as the number of distribution centers and customers mandating RFID tags grow. Slap and ship will carry a higher price tag as more and more shipments require RFID tags. Breaking down pallets just to apply labels to them will put pressure on space and manpower resources.
RFID applicators are a flexible and cost-effective method for CSG suppliers that will grow with them as they move from proof-of-concept implementation and pilot through incremental stages of deployment, from stand-alone systems to fully integrated processes.
About the Author
Giles Manias is a vice president at Paragon Data Systems, the premier provider of RFID, barcode, and data collection solutions. For more information on Paragon Data Systems call 800-211-0768 or visit www.paragondsi.com.