Machine Vision Eyes New Applications

Integrated with upstream systems, inspection data can empower quality control departments, and give QC a whole new “look.”

Share Print Related RSS
Page 1 of 2 « Prev 1 | 2 View on one page
By Doug Bartholomew, Contributing Editor

Most pharmaceutical manufacturers use machine vision in one or more inspection applications, but concerns about validation and 21 CFR Part 11 prevent many plants from using data from these systems to the fullest. Instead, many companies let their machine vision inspection systems perform the simple task of accepting or rejecting capsules, bottles and labels on the production line. “We don’t typically integrate this data into our line,” says Mark Lozen, package engineering manager at Patheon Pharmaceuticals (Cincinnati). “It’s strictly used on a 'go/no go’ basis.”

Unfortunately, drug makers may be missing out on other potential machine vision benefits, experts say. “Absolutely, you’d want to shoot that data upstream, so that quality service managers could look at it in real time and make decisions,” says Reno Suffi, product manager of the sensing group at Omron Electronics (Schaumburg, Ill.), a vendor of vision, safety, and fiber-optic technology. “Unfortunately, a lot of companies don’t implement the data portion of the technology, they just do the 'go/no go’ part of it.”

Regulatory concerns make companies reluctant to integrate production line machine vision data with other upstream information such as manufacturing execution systems (MES) is regulatory. Many believe that, by doing so, the machine vision systems, whicih usually operate in stand-alone mode, would be subject to FDA regulations for electronic signatures, data access and security. “You start getting into 21 CFR Part 11 validation and documentation issues,” confirms Patheon’s Lozen.

Suffi agrees, although he points out that stand-alone machine vision systems do not, technically, fall under the constraints of 21 CFR Part 11. Nevertheless, pharmaceutical companies are being cautious and taking a “wait and see” approach, he says.

Taking machine vision beyond pass/fail

Despite their caution, though, more drug manufacturers are extending the use of machine vision not only to cull questionable or defective products and labels, but also to identify production problems early. “The pass/fail inspection information from machine vision can be used to troubleshoot a system,” says Chris Clarke, president of Clarke Engineering Services, Inc. (Indianapolis), a vision system integrator.

“Typically, there is a simple pass/fail output signal that goes to a programmable logic controller (PLC) or some other device, which will instruct another component on the line to reject that package,” explains Steve Wong, pharmaceutical and medical industry marketing manager at Banner Engineering (Minneapolis), a leading machine vision systems vendor. If a system has, say, 20 fails in an hour, “an alarm is triggered and a request is made for maintenance on the line,” Wong adds.

At Eli Lilly, for instance, Clarke Engineering used machine vision sensors from Cognex Corp. (Natick, Mass.) to develop a fully-integrated tray inspection system that enables operators to isolate and solve root causes of count deviations. Lilly’s goal with the new system was to improve quality by performing a total visual inspection of vials produced at the company’s Indianapolis plant, replacing mechanical counters that were prone to jam and resulted in counting errors.

The new quality inspection system, the TIS-3000, combines vision technology with automatic tray handling. In addition to counting vials, it uses machine vision to detect fallen vials, identify missing flip-seals, and verify vial color. The system also differs from most in that it performs the vial count at the front end as well as the back end, thereby establishing a performance benchmark and eliminating much rework.

“The TIS-3000 establishes the initial count on our packaging line,” explains Rob Stapleton, operations team leader at Eli Lilly. “If the numbers do not reconcile at the end of the line, we have to open up the entire job and find out why a discrepancy exists. This can be very costly and time consuming, considering packaging order sizes that range up to 360,000 vials.”

The image is captured by a single Cognex In-Sight vision sensor suspended inside a hood in which the conveyor area is illuminated by high-frequency fluorescent lamps. The system makes a pass-fail decision based on a pre-established count of how many vials should be in each tray. Any tray that fails to contain the proper count is rejected.

Trays that are rejected because they contain a cap whose vial is the wrong color, sometimes referred to as a “stranger,” will cause the system to shut down. “If a 'stranger’ is detected, the system locks up and requires supervisor intervention before the tray proceeds to the reject station,” Clarke says. “This is an important feature in order to error-proof the process to prevent the wrong medication from being packaged into a lot.”

Trays rejected because the count is wrong or a vial has fallen down are automatically returned to the load station operator via a reject conveyor. There, the operator can view the cause of the failure on a screen mounted on a pivot arm, fix the problem, and send the tray back through.

Chris Clarke, the creator of the tray inspection system with Eli Lilly, says it ensures 100% accountability of all product throughout the process. In case of a process failure, Clarke points out that three consecutive failures will automatically halt the machine. Two of these systems have been installed and validated at the company’s Indianapolis facility.

Aiding QC with a PC

Manufacturers that want to further investigate quality issues can elect to save the last 100 rejects as image files. These can be stored on a PC used by the operator or a plant supervisor. “The decision point is usually in the operator’s hands,” Clarke says.

Some machine vision software packages, such as Cognex’s In-Sight system, include traceability capabilities, Clarke says. “With this you can track who made changes to the system, what kind of changes were made, and when,” he says. “The systems with a 21 CFR Part 11 package option will track the history of the machine vision inspection. Certain events are logged and that information is stored and can be retrieved.”

Page 1 of 2 « Prev 1 | 2 View on one page
Share Print Reprints Permissions

What are your comments?

Join the discussion today. Login Here.

Comments

No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments